Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Publication

Is body dissatisfaction related to an attentional bias towards low weight bodies in non-clinical samples of women? A systematic review and meta-analysis

House, Thea
Graham, K
Ellis, Bridget
Attwood, Angela
Stephen, Ian
Brooks, Kevin
Penton-Voak, Ian
Glos Author
Date
2022-12-21
Journal Title
Type
Journal Article
Engagement
Google Scholar:
Altmetric:
Abstract
Body dissatisfaction is defined as the negative subjective evaluation of one's body and is considered a risk factor for, and symptom of, eating disorders. Some studies show women with high body dissatisfaction display an attentional bias towards low weight bodies; however, this finding is not consistent, and results are yet to be systematically synthesised. We conducted a qualitative and quantitative synthesis of cross-sectional studies investigating the relationship between body dissatisfaction and attentional bias to low weight bodies in non-clinical samples of women. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and OpenGrey for studies up until September 2022. We identified 34 eligible studies involving a total of 2857 women. A meta-analysis of 26 studies (75 effects) found some evidence from gaze tracking studies for a positive association between body dissatisfaction and attentional bias to low weight bodies. We found no evidence for an association from studies measuring attention using the dot probe task, electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, or the modified spatial cueing task. The results together provide partial support for the positive association between body dissatisfaction and attentional bias to low weight bodies in women. These findings can be used to inform future attentional bias research.
Citation
House, T., Graham, K., Ellis, B., Bould, H., Attwood, A. S., Stephen, I. D., Brooks, K. R., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2023). Is body dissatisfaction related to an attentional bias towards low weight bodies in non-clinical samples of women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Body image, 44, 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.12.003
Usage rights
CC BY 4.0