Publication

Biomechanical comparison of 3 types of transdiscal fixation implants for fixing high-grade L5/S1 spine spondylolisthesis

Gee, Aaron
Fernandes, Renan
Kanawati, Andrew
Jin, Winston
Gurr, Kevin
Bailey, Christopher
Zdero, Radovan
Rasoulinejad, Parham
Glos Author
Date
2021-04-30
Journal Title
Type
Journal Article
Engagement
Google Scholar:
Altmetric:
Abstract
Background context: There are several options for the stabilization of high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis including transdiscal screws, the Bohlman technique (transdiscal fibular strut) and the modified Bohlman technique (transdiscal titanium mesh cage). The choice of an optimum construct remains controversial; therefore, we endeavoured to study and compare the biomechanical performance of these 3 techniques. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare 3 types of transdiscal fixation biomechanically in an in vitro porcine lumbar-sacral spine model. Study design/setting: Porcine cadaveric biomechanical study. Methods: 18 complete lumbar-sacral porcine spines were split into 3 repair groups, transdiscal screws (TS), Bohlman technique, and a modified Bohlman technique (MBT). Range of motion (L3 - S1) was measured in an intact and repaired state for flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right torsion. To recreate a high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis a bilateral L5/S1 facetectomy, removing the intervertebral disc completely, and the L5 body was displaced 50%-60% over the sacral promontory. Results were analyzed and compared to intact baseline measurements. Standard quasi-static moments (5 Nm) were applied in all modes. Results: All range of motion (ROM) were in reference to intact baseline values. TS had the lowest ROM in all modes (p=.006-.495). Statistical difference was found only in extension for TS vs. BT (p=.011) and TS vs. MBT (p=.014). No bone or implant failures occurred. Conclusion: TS provided the lowest ROM in all modes of loading compared to Bohlman technique and MBT. Our study indicates that TS results in the most biomechanically stable construct. Clinical significance: Knowledge of the biomechanical attributes of various constructs could aid physicians in choosing a surgical construct for their patients.
Citation
Kerr, H. L., Gee, A., Fernandes, R. J. R., Kanawati, A. J., Jin, W., Gurr, K. R., Bailey, C. S., Zdero, R., & Rasoulinejad, P. (2021). Biomechanical comparison of 3 types of transdiscal fixation implants for fixing high-grade L5/S1 spine spondylolisthesis. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 21(9), 1587–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.017
Registration number
License
Usage rights
License